Get started
How it worksLive scanDocsPricingGet started
how we fit together

Wystan + Sentry

Sentry owns the error — the stack trace, the release, the user it hit — and with Seer it now reviews your pull requests with production telemetry in hand. Wystan sits one level up: it groups Sentry’s errors by the product feature they land in, joins them to usage, ownership and history, and tells every PR what it is touching. Sentry says this stack trace broke; Wystan says Checkout broke. We consume Sentry, we don’t replace it.

What Sentry does best

The system of record for production errors. Symbolicated stack traces, release health, session replay, profiling — and Seer, the AI agent that finds root causes and reviews PRs with production context, flat-priced per active contributor.

  • Error & performance monitoring with symbolicated stack traces
  • Release health, session replay, profiling
  • Seer: AI root-cause analysis + production-aware PR review
  • Flat $40 / active contributor / mo for Seer, unlimited usage
  • First-party MCP server
What Wystan adds

The product grain. Sentry attributes an error to an issue, a file and a release; Wystan attributes it to a named product feature and a user journey — and puts usage, ownership and history on the same row.

  • Errors grouped by product feature (“Checkout broke”), not by stack trace
  • Usage, ownership and history joined to the same feature
  • PR comment: which features the diff touches + their live error count
  • Weekly Slack digest: which features regressed this week
  • Per-org pricing, unlimited developers — zero SDK changes, we read your Sentry
using both

How they actually combine

1
Developer pushes a PR with changes to chargeCustomer() in the billing module.
2
Seer reviews the diff with production context — flags a null path it has seen fail in prod, suggests a guard.
3
Wystan layer adds “this PR touches Checkout (94th future fix-work percentile inside this repository, 9 Sentry errors in the last 7 days, 18% of traffic) and code also mapped to Subscriptions; 38% of its attributable lines were last changed by authors now inactive in this repository.”
or alone

Just Wystan, on its own

Without Sentry, Wystan still maps, scores and comments — you lose the production error overlay, and keep everything that comes from git history: features, journeys, maintenance pressure, inactive-author ownership, rework and structural overlap. Without Wystan, Sentry tells you what broke and where in the code — but not which product capability it belongs to, how much traffic that capability carries, or how it has been trending. The two are designed to stack.

side by side

Where each one focuses

Focus areaSentryWystan
Primary unitIssue / stack trace / releaseProduct feature + user flow
Production errors✓ the source✓ grouped per feature (read from Sentry)
PR reviewSeer — the diff, with production contextFeature map + fix-work rank + structural reach + contribution evidence
History & trendsRelease healthMaintenance pressure, rework and inactive-author ownership per feature, over time
Usage—PostHog traffic per mapped feature, kept as its own evidence channel
MCP server✓✓ + 14 tools
PricingSeer $40 / active contributor / mo$99–299 / org / mo, unlimited developers
Best fitDebugging and incident triageKnowing what changed, what it touched, and what is getting worse
honest take

No vendor pressure

Sentry is the system of record for production errors, and Seer is the most direct overlap with what we do at PR time. We don’t compete on stack traces. Our slice is the product grain: Sentry says this trace broke; Wystan says Checkout broke, it carries 18% of traffic, its owner left, and this PR touches it. If your pain is debugging → Sentry. If it is knowing what your agents and humans changed, in product terms, and whether it is getting worse → Wystan. Most of our users run Sentry underneath.
also comparing

Other tools we work alongside

see it on your code

See your product through the code.
Get your first impact report.

read-only git accessno SDK to installfull report after every scan